|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Corley, M.D., FACP |
|
ACP-ASIM Annual Session 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrows down candidates |
|
Allows EMRs to be evaluated in a systematic
fashion |
|
Allows for side by side comparison of features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperless? |
|
More legible? |
|
Rx writing only? |
|
Notes only? |
|
ASP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduling |
|
Billing |
|
Patient Education |
|
Decision Support |
|
Drug Interactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meet with all staff and determine what features
are important |
|
These should be separated in those that are
required and those that are desired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List existing hardware and software that is to
be used |
|
Consider level of staff training needed |
|
Consider who will use the system and how |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is your budget? |
|
Consider both acquisition costs and maintenance
costs? |
|
What is your practice growth anticipated to be? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How long have they been in business? |
|
In what capacity? |
|
# of Programmers, support staff, trainers |
|
R&D budget |
|
Financial references |
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
Hardware |
|
Training |
|
Updates |
|
Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of hardware to run software |
|
Minimal and optimal requirements |
|
Purchased separately? |
|
Maintenance costs/support contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of platforms supported |
|
NT, Windows, Unix, Novell |
|
Are there data base requirements |
|
Sequel, Oracle... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of training |
|
Included in software price? |
|
Amount of time for price |
|
Scheduling requirements for trainer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPLETE cost of software |
|
All packages desired |
|
Correct number of users |
|
All interfaces |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Http://www.computingforclinicians.com |
|
Http://www.cpri.org |
|
http://www.yahoo.com/Business_and_Economy/Companies/Health/Software/Health_Care_Management/Practice_Information_Management/Medical_Record_Systems/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade shows and meetings |
|
ACP_ASIM Annual Session |
|
|
|
Publications |
|
Medical Software Reviews |
|
Health Care Informatics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrow request to 2-4 vendors |
|
Give reasonable deadline for response |
|
Review proposals for completeness as they arrive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record does not have basic functions you require |
|
Package is too expensive |
|
No sites with similar practices are happy with
the software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all basic required functions are available |
|
If similar practice sites are satisfied |
|
If it fits your budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have all available users present |
|
Do not allow distractions |
|
Allow adequate time for complete demo and
questions |
|
Make sure all features are shown |
|
Try it out yourself |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features which are too good to be true often are |
|
Features that cannot be demonstrated are not yet
features! |
|
Be sure to create new notes and data during the
demo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
practice similar to yours |
|
At least 2 years of experience with the system |
|
Closest ones that meet above criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Include a representative from all areas of
users. |
|
Make sure that members are familiar with
computers |
|
Gather questions from others who will not be
traveling to the site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing the chart |
|
Writing or dictating a note |
|
Writing prescriptions |
|
Ordering tests and reviewing results |
|
Patient phone calls to the physician |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal messages between staff |
|
Outside requests for charts |
|
Internal requests for charts |
|
Insurance requests for information |
|
Review of transcription |
|
Making appointments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit reports |
|
Missing progress notes |
|
Unsigned notes |
|
Non-reviewed results |
|
Health maintenance compliance |
|
Documenting no-shows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phone messages |
|
Prescription refills |
|
Entering vital signs, medications, and chief
complaint |
|
Recording procedures |
|
|
|
|
Interfaces with equipment in office |
|
Interfaces with outside labs |
|
Test ordering |
|
Results Reporting |
|
Specimen tracking |
|
Quality/ Accuracy monitoring |
|
|
|
|
How dependable is the system? |
|
Any hidden costs? |
|
How often are upgrades done? |
|
Is vendor responsive to suggestions for
upgrades? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts are often given for larger installs |
|
Discounts may be given if you can have a several
physicians or groups in your area who all purchase a system at the same
time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small number of installs |
|
New product |
|
New to geographic location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer |
|
Cost |
|
Service |
|
Installation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cable vs. wireless |
|
Network software |
|
Network cards |
|
Network maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assistance to be provided |
|
Time frame of assistance |
|
Costs if any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modules included |
|
cost for adding them later |
|
Maximum users |
|
cost for additional users |
|
Upgrades |
|
frequency and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number to be trained |
|
Hours to be provided |
|
Costs of additional training |
|
On site vs. distant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set up forms/demographics/codes |
|
try to negotiate a flat rate |
|
Set up lab interfaces |
|
try to negotiate a flat rate |
|
Templates |
|
costs for upgrades and customized creation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who provides this |
|
local or central |
|
Hours of operation |
|
costs for extended hours |
|
Hours of support provided |
|
flat rate vs. hourly charges for additional
support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah T. Corley, MD, FACP |
|
|
|
|
Involve everyone whom the EMR will impact |
|
Coordinate your “People Strategy” and “Technical
Strategy” |
|
Use project management software |
|
Consider using a consultant |
|
|
|
|
|
Develop user groups |
|
Physician user group |
|
Nursing user group |
|
Office user group |
|
Lab user group |
|
Meet regularly |
|
Make assignments & require input |
|
Make it fun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gantt Chart with time lines |
|
Defines tasks, responsibilities, & resources |
|
Keeps goals realistic |
|
Helps ensure commitment of team members |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Glacier Approach |
|
Function by function, practitioner by
practitioner |
|
Less pain for a longer period of time |
|
Greater opportunity for bad habits &
work-arounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The “big bang” approach |
|
All functions, al users, all at once |
|
More pain for less time |
|
Better chance of full implementation |
|
|
|
|
|
Department by Department |
|
Perhaps the best approach for large multi
specialty practices |
|
Start with most motivated group |
|
Play up success |
|
Track efficiencies and improved productivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan for the change in practice work flow |
|
No filing or hunting for paper charts but
scanning and loading of outside results must be done |
|
Exam rooms may need to change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talk to referring/referral sources |
|
Explain cost savings of sending
reports/referrals electronically |
|
Develop HIPAA compliance plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|